Human–Autonomy Teaming: Team Trust Metrics—Wingman Simulation Study
Loading...
Files
Authors
Schaefer, Kristin E.
Brewer, Ralph
Baker, Anthony
Krausman, Andrea
Neubauer. Catherine
Chhan, David
Carter, Evan
Canady, Jonroy
Milner, Alyssa
Seong, Dae Han
Issue Date
2020-11
Type
Reports
Language
Keywords
human-autonomy teaming , wingman , trust , wearable technologies , team effectiveness
Alternative Title
Abstract
This report presents the results from collaborative exploratory research designed to identify and assess different metrics of team trust and team cohesion that may be relevant to military human–autonomy teams. This was a simulation study using the Wingman Joint Capabilities Technology Demonstration simulation testbed to conduct manned–unmanned teaming scenarios on Table VI gunnery evaluations. Participants worked as a team to operate a simulated robotic ground vehicle from a simulated command-and-control vehicle to identify and engage targets on a simulated Army gunnery range. Findings suggest the importance of a multimethod approach to analyzing team trust and team cohesion. Traditional metrics based on team performance ratings or self-report are not indicative of the full team-trust relationship. This research provides valuable insights into how different measurement techniques can provide a more global understanding of the trust relationship.
Description
Citation
Schaefer, Kristin E., Ralph W. Brewer, Anthony L. Baker, Andrea Krausman, Catherine Neubauer, David Chhan, Evan Carter et al. "Human–Autonomy Teaming: Team Trust Metrics—Wingman Simulation Study." DTIC, ARL-TR-9111.
Publisher
DTIC