One Size Fits All? A Study On State Professionalism And Election Security Grant Expenditures

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Johnston, Bryce

Issue Date

2023

Type

Journal articles

Language

Keywords

State expenditures

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Currently, the United States pursues a “one size fits all” policy for federal grants to states by conflating their legislative capacity. This may not be effective: many states have differing levels of professionalization measured by frequency of sessions, staffing resources for legislatures, and pay. This study examines state expenditures of grant funding made available through the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). Variations in state expenditures potentially illustrate how professionalism affects state spending on election security. The study finds that more professional state legislatures tend to spend more on election security regardless of political affiliation. The effect of professionalism on election expenditure is more pronounced when the Federal Government increases requirements on state legislatures during the application process. While this study is focused on grants geared towards election expenditures, it could have broad applications for how the Federal Government incentivizes states to spend money on national initiatives.

Description

Citation

Bryce Johnston “One Size Fits All? A Study On State Professionalism And Election Security Grant Expenditures”. West Point Journal Of Politics And Security 2, No. 1 (2023).

Publisher

West Point Press

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN