Modified Layered-Sectional Analysis for Forensic Investigation
dc.contributor.author | McCoy, Brad C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Seracino, Rudolf | |
dc.contributor.author | Leming, Michael L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-20T18:19:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-20T18:19:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper describes a modification to the layered-sectional analysis approach, which provides the engineer with a tool to assess structural behavior of concrete beams with localized damage, a problem not well suited to classical, closed-form solutions. The modified layered-sectional analysis (MLSA) framework is applied to a forensic investigation case study in which two prestressed double-tee beams are exposed to a short duration, intense fire in a parking structure. The results of the MLSA are within 1% of the case study load test, which indicates that the MLSA could be a useful, computationally efficient tool for the investigating engineer to predict the postfire serviceability and strength of damaged beams, and potentially eliminate the need for expensive load testing. A short parametric study is included for the research engineer interested in the MLSA for predicting the postdamage behavior of non-standard materials such as enhanced sustainability concrete (ESC). | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering | |
dc.identifier.citation | McCoy, Seracino, and Leming, “Modified Layered-Sectional Analysis for Forensic Investigation.” 2015. | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000583 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0887-3828 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1943-5509 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14216/933 | |
dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
dc.subject | Enhanced sustainability concrete (ESC) | |
dc.title | Modified Layered-Sectional Analysis for Forensic Investigation | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
local.peerReviewed | Yes | |
oaire.citation.issue | 4 | |
oaire.citation.volume | 29 |