Treaty termination and the presidency: Using custom to solve separation of powers disputes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Lapointe, Joseph M.

Issue Date

2020

Type

Journal articles

Language

Keywords

Executive-legislative power

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

The debate over whether the President, the Senate, or the Congress has primacy in treaty termination remains unsettled. Professor Curtis Bradley incorrectly argues that custom supports a presidential authority to terminate treaties independently. This paper argues that a fuller view of custom, combined with the Intent of the Framers and functional considerations, shows treaty termination is a shared executive-legislative power.

Description

Citation

Lapointe, J. M. (2020). Treaty termination and the presidency: Using custom to solve separation of powers disputes. Charleston Law Review, 14(1), 133-204.

Publisher

Charleston Law Review

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN