Transformation Under Fire: A Historical Case Study with Modern Parallels

dc.contributor.authorKimball, Raymond A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T15:39:43Z
dc.date.available2023-08-24T15:39:43Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractRarely have an army’s fortunes shifted so much in such a short period. At the end of 1917, the Imperial Russian Army, bled dry and exhausted from the twin blows of tsarist incompetence and prolonged modern warfare, essentially ceased to exist. The military situation in 1920 could scarcely have been more different. The Red Army’s military supremacy over the territory of the soon-to-be Soviet Union was unchallenged and acknowledged by the world’s major powers. All of this made what happened next even more shocking. Later that same year, the Soviets would find themselves utterly defeated and thrown back by the Polish Army, an organization nearly one-tenth the size of the Red Army fielded by a state that had been obliterated from existence for 120 years and reconstituted only 2 years prior. This paper illustrates the hazards inherent in transforming a military under fire, and provides some cautionary lessons for the current U.S. efforts at military transformation. The outbreak of civil war in June 1918 galvanized the creation of the fledgling Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army, authorized by the Congress of Soviets only 6 months before. Specific focus areas for the Supreme Military Council, the chief military body of the new force, included leader development, new organizations and doctrine for the force, and a logistical system capable of supporting warfare across the vast distances of Russia. All of these were shaped by the pressures of transformation under fire, and those transformations would have great impact later. The most significant outcome of these pressures was the permanency of supposedly temporary institutions like the commissars and the limited role of the noncommissioned officer (NCO) corps. Although the Bolsheviks showed real innovation and a healthy pragmatism in constructing their new force, their transformational efforts were ultimately doomed by a stubborn refusal to recognize their own limitations. Flush with victory, the Soviets drove west to settle old scores with the Poles, only to discover that their force was overmatched and incapable of adjusting to the new terrain and enemy. In a very real sense, the Red Army never really knew who it was fighting in Poland, and thus could not bring any of its strengths to bear. Additionally, its methods of logistics and command and control were all shaped by the long fight with the Whites and were wholly unsuitable for battle against a very different enemy...
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for Junior Officers
dc.identifier.citationKimball, Raymond A. Major, "Transformation Under Fire: A Historical Case Study with Modern Parallels" (2007).
dc.identifier.isbn1-58487-319-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14216/454
dc.publisherUnited States Army War College Press
dc.subjectMilitary Strategy
dc.titleTransformation Under Fire: A Historical Case Study with Modern Parallels
dc.typeScholarly papers
local.peerReviewedYes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Transformation Under Fire_ A Historical Case Study with Modern Pa.pdf
Size:
268.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format